ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the safety and clinical value of percutaneous ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy(PUS-CNB) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) in pancreas mass.@*Methods@#Ultrasound-guided biopsy were performed in 109 cases who were difficult to diagnose to get specimens from the highly suspicious parts of the lesions by avoiding vessels. PUS-CNB were performed in 82 cases, EUS-FNA in 19 cases and both in 8 cases. The site and size of lesions were recorded preopeartion. Specimens with clear pathological diagnosis were considered as satisfactory materials. Specimens that were impossible to puncture due to the existence of high risk factors in the process of puncture were considered as unsuccessful biopsy. All patients were followed up after biopsy and complications were recorded.@*Results@#The satisfaction rate and success rate of PUS-CNB were 98.89% and 100%, the diagnostic accuracy and false negative rate were 97.78% and 2.22%. The satisfaction rate and success rate of EUS-FNA were 96.15% and 96.30%, the diagnostic accuracy and false negative rate were 80.77% and 23.81%. There were no serious complications such as pancreatic fistula, hemorrhage and needle transfer at the needle site after puncture.@*Conclusions@#Both PUS-CNB and EUS-FNA are safe and effective methods for the diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic lesions and have high clinical values. Reasonable selection of EUS-FNA and PUS-CNB can safely and reliably identify and diffentiate the benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the safety and clinical value of percutaneous ultrasound‐guided core needle biopsy( PUS‐CNB) and endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration( EUS‐FNA ) in pancreas mass . Methods Ultrasound‐guided biopsy were performed in 109 cases who were difficult to diagnose to get specimens from the highly suspicious parts of the lesions by avoiding vessels . PUS‐CNB were performed in 82 cases , EUS‐FNA in 19 cases and both in 8 cases . T he site and size of lesions were recorded preopeartion . Specimens with clear pathological diagnosis were considered as satisfactory materials . Specimens that were impossible to puncture due to the existence of high risk factors in the process of puncture were considered as unsuccessful biopsy . All patients were followed up after biopsy and complications were recorded . Results The satisfaction rate and success rate of PUS‐CNB were 98 .89% and 100% ,the diagnostic accuracy and false negative rate were 97 .78% and 2 .22% . T he satisfaction rate and success rate of EUS‐FNA were 96 .15% and 96 .30% ,the diagnostic accuracy and false negative rate were 80 .77% and 23 .81% . T here were no serious complications such as pancreatic fistula ,hemorrhage and needle transfer at the needle site after puncture . Conclusions Both PUS‐CNB and EUS‐FNA are safe and effective methods for the diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic lesions and have high clinical values . Reasonable selection of EUS‐FNA and PUS‐CNB can safely and reliably identify and diffentiate the benign and malignant pancreatic lesions .
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To study the clinicopathologic features of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct(IPNB) and to analyze the diagnostic and therapeutic patterns.@*Methods@#The data of 46 patients with IPNB undergoing surgery in Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2013 to November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 23 males and 23 females with age of (64±8)years.Patients were followed up by clinics and telephone inquiry.Categorical data were compared with χ2 test or Fisher′s exact test.@*Results@#Abdominal pain(in 31 patients), fever (in 15 patients) and jaundice (in 11 patients) were the most common symptoms.Twenty-five patients were accompanied with cholangiolithiasis and 25 were accompanied with liver atrophy.Preoperative laboratory examination was mainly manifested as the abnormal liver function caused by biliary obstruction.Typical imaging findings included bile duct dilation (in 45 patients) and mass within bile duct (in 22 patients). All the patients were diagnosed as IPNB histopathologically.Among them, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and related adenocarcinoma were more common in mucus-hypersecretion IPNB ((13/15 vs. 51.6%(16/31))(χ2=5.331, P=0.021). Hepatectomy was performed in 25 patients, hepatectomy combined with biliary resection and reconstruction in 12 cases, biliary resection and reconstruction in 3 cases, pancreatoduodenectomy in 3 cases, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy in 1 case, liver transplantation in 1 case and radiofrequency ablation in 1 case.Forty-one patients were followed up with a median of 30 (12, 41) months.Seven patients suffered recurrence and 6 died.@*Conclusion@#IPNB is a rare disease with limited knowledge currently.Images are the main diagnositc means and surgery is the first choice.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the diagnostic value of BRAF V600E mutation combined with shear wave elastography(SWE) for thyroid nodules of Bethesda Ⅲ diagnosed by fine-neddle aspiration(FNAC).@*Methods@#One hundred and seventeen thyroid nodules diagnosed as Bethesda Ⅲ in the department of ultrasound and confirmed by BRAF V600E gene detection, SWE examination and surgery were collected. BRAF V600E detection, SWE examination and both combined with pathological results were using to retrospective analysis.@*Results@#There were 75 benign nodules and 42 malignant nodules according to pathology. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of BRAF V600E combined with SWE were higher than single BRAF V600E mutation detection and SWE with statistically significant(P=0.01, 0.001; P=0.029, 0.01, respectively). There were no statistically differences between single BRAF V600E mutation detection and SWE for Bethesda Ⅲ nodules(P=0.483, 0.645).@*Conclusions@#BRAF V600E mutation detection combined with SWE can improve the sensitivity and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of Bethesda Ⅲ thyroid nodules.